Abstract
This study explores the impact of digital technology adoption on the carbon footprint of SMEs. Utilizing a framework aligned with the ISO Standard 14040 for Life Cycle Assessment, the research evaluates how different levels of digital maturity of the Portuguese Ornamental Stone SMEs influence KPIs related to energy efficiency, production quality, material utilization, and carbon emissions. Companies are categorized by their Digital Rank, ranging from DR#0 (no digitalization) to DR#4 (advanced digital integration). The findings indicate that higher levels of digital maturity are associated with significant environmental and operational benefits. For instance, companies at the DR#4 level achieve a 35.1% reduction in carbon emissions per unit of output compared to those at DR#0. Additionally, these companies show substantial improvements in energy efficiency, producing more units per kWh and enhanced raw material yield, minimizing waste and optimizing resource use. The results underscore the transformative potential of digital technologies in promoting sustainability and operational efficiency. Companies that integrate advanced digital tools not only reduce their environmental impact but also improve their competitiveness and productivity. This research highlights the necessity of a comprehensive approach to digital transformation, encompassing technological investments, organizational change, and process optimization. The study provides actionable insights for policymakers, industry leaders, and SMEs on leveraging digital technologies to achieve sustainability goals. It emphasizes the critical role of digitalization in supporting the global transition to a low-carbon economy. It suggests avenues for future research to explore further integrated digital strategies and their long-term impacts on sustainability.
References
Assessing the Current State of Organizations for AI-Based Digital Transformation. Applied System Innovation, 7(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7010014
Arowoiya, V. A., Moehler, R. C., & Fang, Y. (2024). Digital twin technology for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in buildings: A state-of-the-art and future directions. Energy and Built Environment, 5(5), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.05.004
Asghari, M., Fereidoni, S., Fereidooni, L., Nabisi, M., & Kasaeian, A. (2024). Energy efficiency analysis of applying phase change materials and thermal insulation layers in a building. Energy and Buildings, 312, 114211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114211
Cozzi, L. (2023). CO2 Emissions in 2022. In INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (IEA). https://doi.org/10.1787/12ad1e1a-en
Destefanis, S., Maietta, O. W., Mazzotta, F., & Parisi, L. (2023). Firm survival and innovation: direct and indirect effects of knowledge for SMEs. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2023.2263371
Di Bella, L., Katsinis, A., Lagüera-González, J., Odenthal, L., Hell, M., & Lozar, B. (2023). Annual Report on European SMEs 2022/2023.
Hadavi, A., & Alizadehsalehi, S. (2024). From BIM to metaverse for AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 160, 105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105248
Hoffmann, S., Lasarov, W., Reimers, H., & Trabandt, M. (2024). Carbon footprint tracking apps. Does feedback help reduce carbon emissions? Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139981
Irfan, M., Mahapatra, B., & Shahbaz, M. (2023). Energy efficiency in the Indian transportation sector: effect on carbon emissions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(3), 6653–6676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02981-z
Komkowski, T., Antony, J., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Tortorella, G. L., & Pongboonchai-Empl, T. (2023). The integration of Industry 4.0 and Lean Management: a systematic review and constituting elements perspective. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(7–8), 1052–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2141107
Kulinan, A. S., Park, M., Aung, P. P. W., Cha, G., & Park, S. (2024). Advancing construction site workforce safety monitoring through BIM and computer vision integration. Automation in Construction, 158, 105227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105227
Li, M., Lu, K., Wang, H., & Wang, S. (2020). Integrating BIM with greenhouse-gas emissions in AEC: A scientometric review. E3S Web of Conferences, 143, 0–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202014301008
Silva, A., Dionisio, A., & Almeida, I. (2020). Enabling Cyber-Physical Systems for Industry 4.0 operations: A Service Science Perspective. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(8), 838–846. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.H6804.069820
Silva, A., & Pata, A. (2022). Value Creation in Technology Service Ecosystems - Empirical Case Study. In J. Machado, F. Soares, J. Trojanowska, V. Ivanov, K. Antosz, Y. Ren, V. K. Manupati, & A. Pereira (Eds.), Innovations in Industrial Engeneering II (pp. 26–36). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09360-9_3
Silva, A., Rabadão, C., & Capela, C. (2020). Towards Industry 4.0 | A case study of BIM deployment in ornamental stones sector. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 67, 24535. https://doi.org/ISSN 2307-4531
Slavic, D., Marjanovic, U., Medic, N., Simeunovic, N., & Rakic, S. (2024). The Evaluation of Industry 5.0 Concepts: Social Network Analysis Approach. Applied Sciences, 14(3), 1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031291
Tam, V. W., Zhou, Y., Shen, L., & Le, K. N. (2023). Optimal BIM and LCA integration approach for embodied environmental impact assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135605
United Nations. (2015). Conference of the Parties Twenty-first session - ADOPTION OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT: Vol. FCCC/CP/20 (United Nations (ed.); p. 32). United Nations. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
Verones, F., Hellweg, S., Antón, A., Azevedo, L. B., Chaudhary, A., Cosme, N., Cucurachi, S., de Baan, L., Dong, Y., Fantke, P., Golsteijn, L., Hauschild, M., Heijungs, R., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., Larsen, H., Laurent, A., Mutel, C. L., Margni, M., … Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2020). LC‐IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(6), 1201–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13018
Wang, L., & Shao, J. (2023). Digital economy, entrepreneurship and energy efficiency. Energy, 269, 126801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126801
Wijeratne, P. U., Gunarathna, C., Yang, R. J., Wu, P., Hampson, K., & Shemery, A. (2024). BIM enabler for facilities management: a review of 33 cases. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2222962
Yan, J., Lu, Q., Tang, J., Chen, L., Hong, J., & Broyd, T. (2022). Digital Tools for Revealing and Reducing Carbon Footprint in Infrastructure, Building, and City Scopes. Buildings, 12(8), 1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081097
Ye, X., Lu, Y., & Manoharan, S. (2022). Automated conversion of engineering rules: Towards flexible manufacturing collaboration. Results in Engineering, 16(September), 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100680

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 EARTH & PLANETARY INSIGHTS - Scientific Peer-Reviewed Journal of the SWS Scholarly Society Vienna